Excuse me for being vulgar…I really do not like that word…it is ugly and demeaning to women..which means it is the perfect word to describe Ann Coulter..the meanest, ugliest, vilest most vicious heartles bitch that I have ever had the misfortune to run across..I have called a special meeting with the Goddess, and have asked for permission to personally punish her….. permission granted….so when you read about her being on the receiving end of a cosmic bip of super nova proportions, you will know it was me at my finest..Because if anyone deserves to be bipped and bipped good, it is that skinny, scrawny, useless peice of flesh…She has been engaged 3 times but never married..that’s because black widows eat their partners after mating…you will probably find their bloodless bodies hanging from the ceiling in her attic. If anyone wants to know where to find the person bearing the 666 mark..you have to look no further…Iam sure they are on her someplace. Because she is evil….EVIL… but a bip is coming her way…coming soon….


21 Responses to “…….ANN COULTER IS A CUNT…….”

  1. Nancy Says:

    Ann Coulter’s Problem: Going Too Far
    by Michael J. Gaynor
    Jun 9, 2006

    Good News: In “Godless: The Church of Liberalism”, Ann Coulter deftly depicts liberalism as a perverse religion, diligently details its war on God and the glorious religious tradition on which America was founded, and delightfully deals with the subject of abortion and the United States Supreme Court’s deplorable decision to deprive the states of the right to regulate abortion by devising a constitutional right to abort — because it is the United States Supreme Court.

    Bad News: Instead of focusing on the substance of this compelling book, NBC is wrongly reviling Ann for a few words of gratuitous abuse aimed at the September 11 widows (actually, just four of them); Ann needlessly (and foolishly) gave her cunning critics an opening by going too far in commenting on four atypical members of that group; and Ann stubbornly refuses to admit that she went too far in her zeal (even when Bill O’Reilly and Laura Ingraham gently let her know that she did).

    It’s a pity. Really. Ann Coulter is blessed with brains and beauty, wit and wisdom. But sometimes she just can’t resist the temptation to overstate her case, and the result is that she detracts from her meritorious message and discredits herself, as she attracts undesirable attention to herself and shifts the focus from her acute and astute analysis to her unsubstantiated ad hominem attacks.

    Ann wrote a fabulous book and spoiled it by including unsubstantiated personal attacks on “the Jersey widows” — four leftists (Kristen Breitweiser, Mindy Kleinberg, Lorie Van Auken and Patty Casazza) who have exploited the deaths of their husbands on September 11, 2001 to promote their political agenda — just as Cindy Sheehan exploited the heroic death of her son (Casey).

    Ann is very upset with the Left using widows and the mother of a soldier who died serving his country during the War on Terror. And rightly so. Tragic deaths of relatives should not immunize such persons from political criticism. Or even substantiated personal criticism with some relevance to political issues.

    But, Ann went too far in implying that because the Jersey widows enjoy their sudden celebrity status, they enjoyed the deaths of their husbands, tastelessly wondering whether they would soon have been divorcees but for the September 11 attacks, and suggesting that they should pose for a men’s magazine before they age further. Ann may have boosted book sales, but she detracted from her message by making herself look cruel (Hillary quickly suggested “Godless” should have been titled “Heartless”), and shifting the focus from her main message to her seemingly mean-spirited verbal excess.

    Ann acknowledged that she is a sinner (“I’m proud to have this great fellow sinner in our party”) in “Revenge of the Queers” (March 15, 2006) — a memorable article lamenting the Left’s abuse of black Republicans (“I guess the only way we’ll ever find out how many blacks have worked in the Bush administration is to wait for them to get in trouble someday, so we can read the breathless, triumphant stories on the front page of The New York Times about a black Republican scofflaw”) — Ann provided the kind of detail about Mr. Allen that the leftist media would be loathe to in supporting Claude Allen, a black Republican who had worked for President Bush. Allen had allegedly violated some laws in his personal life, and exquisitely skewered the Executive Editor of The New York Times: “A small part of Times Executive Editor Bill Keller dies every time the paper is forced to mention any black top officials in the Bush administration. It might remind people that the most highly placed black in the Clinton administration was his secretary, Betty Currie.”

    Unfortunately, the wonderful article is also noteworthy for Ann assailing The Times for “wallowing in [Mr. Allen’s] agony.” Ann wrote: “I’ve never seen people enjoy another person’s private pain so much — at least not since a prosecutor started investigating Rush Limbaugh for taking too many back pain pills.”

    Ann, plenty of people who agree wholeheartedly with you on the major issues are sad that, it appears from your words, you are wallowing in the private agony of the Jersey widows as well as exposing the Left’s strategy of using them as human shields. You didn’t need to speculate that they enjoyed the deaths of their husband (even though you apparently believe it), since you don’t know and can’t prove it. And referring to them as harpies — foul malign creatures in Greek mythology that are part woman and part bird and, more generally, predatory or shrewish women — was too much. (If you want to refer to Hillary as a haridan, go to it, but without supporting evidence, call the widows ‘widows’ instead of harpies, or witches.)

    The article also shows that Ann is well aware that the Left loathes her (“Let me be the first to say: Congratulations, Mr. Allen! The New York Times really hates you. Welcome to my world. We’re so happy to have you in our club”). That knowledge should have made Ann more careful, since she knows that the Left is waiting anxiously to destroy her, but it did not.

    Is this why your so mad? I agree with you, she’s a bit of a loose cannon and off the wall.

  2. Jezebelle Says:

    I have been so into blogging lately I haven’t been following the news as close as I usually do. So I am not sure who this Ann is. But by reading several blogs I am finding she is not popular.If you say she is a cunt, then I believe it!

  3. Babs Says:

    LMAO!! Yep, that word is reserved for a select few.

  4. Brad Says:

    I’m starting to think the word “cunt” was created in anticipation of her arrival on this earth, whatever gender she originally had.

  5. apositivepessimist Says:

    i’m guessing a name change is in order for her…ann cuntler.

  6. dave Says:

    Typical left wing BS. All you can do is call names and slander people, but can’t debate on the facts. You are so sheltered….I feel sorry for you.

  7. yellowdog granny Says:

    dear dave ………..please reread my profile…it is especially for folks like you….somethings are to vile to be debated….and the only thing sheltered on my is my feet from my tits…and save the pity for your ownself….bip..coming ..right about……..now…gotcha

  8. yellowdog granny Says:

    hey nancy….explain the letter for me…cause i cant agree with any part of it if he is saying she is right in any of her writings, speaches,etc…

  9. yellowdog granny Says:

    jeez..doesnt anyone remember to read my profile…the part about if you dont like what i have to say..to get fucked and kiss my ass??,….guess not…

  10. dave Says:

    you are in need of serious help. must be part of moveon.org

  11. yellowdog granny Says:

    hey dave…if you dont like what i say or agree with it..what the fuckya doing hanging around…dont you have any friends you can go play with..???

  12. soonerfan78 Says:

    So Dave, enlighten us on your facts. I am allways objective until I hear both sides, then I become very opiniated.

    Personally I despise Coulter as well, not because of HER opinions, but I think she is a disgusting individual in GENERAL.

  13. dom Says:

    I had heard of her ,but didn’t know why ,so I googled and read… now I have to agree with you especially after what she said about the 9/11 widows … bitch !
    You might like this article in Newshounds JS


  14. dom Says:

    Oh and Gooooooooo England ! Kick off in 4 hours… gotta run

  15. Ellie Says:

    cunt is too good a word. she is demeaning to the word. i can be a cunt. but i am never coulter.

  16. leo myshkin Says:

    anne is one of the reasons ganesh gave us remote controls. when i see her lovely face i merely push the “previous channel” button.

  17. Junebugg Says:

    Does this mean that you don’t like here LOL
    Be afraid Ann, Be Very Afraid…….

  18. Nit Wit Says:

    I don’t even class her as human. The only reason she opens her pie hole is to say something that is so insane that it is sure to get her the attention she lives for. Every so often she starts to feel that she is not the center of the universe and has to say or do something that hides how really alone she is.

    Dave has to hang out at sites like yours. You have to admit that the Daves of this world are fast becoming an endangered species. You know Neocon right or wrong.
    Moving sucks!

  19. Joshua Says:

    To use a risky analogy, she is as the former mouthpiece of Saddam who assured the Iraqis that the Americans were retreating, even as they were rolling into Baghdad.

    She will heap on the lies until her cause goes under, and they shall all remain in denial even when everyone else can see the truth.

    They have very bad karma.

  20. Scottish Toodler Says:

    I didn’t follow all of this, but I will check out the Betty Bowers link you sent me,,, just got your comment… hahaha, I didn’t get it either, I think because India is so poor and he wanted to prove that he didn’t need money.

  21. Mama Kelly Says:

    cant stand ann coulter

    and her latest insanity, referring to 9/11 widows as “self-obsessed” and “witches.” was so thoroughly offensive (in more ways than one) that Im not sure the Cword is even strong enough to suffice

    after all, “we’re talking about the woman who said that Timothy McVeigh’s only mistake was in not blowing up The New York Times building and that we should invade Muslim countries, kill their leaders and convert the people to Christianity. ”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: